Holly Bailey
|
Jun 17, 2009 06:25 PM
Your Gaggler is starting to sense a pattern at the White House. For two straight days, on two very different subjects, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs has defended a move that seems counter to what President Obama said during the campaign by seeming to punt the blame on the folks who made the rules before them. On Tuesday, it was the Obama administration’s decision to reject a request to make visitor logs to the White House public. According to Gibbs, the “previous policy” is under review but until then the White House will stick with the status quo, i.e., no visitor logs released, no way. Today, Gibbs was asked about Obama’s position on the Defense of Marriage Act, which Obama has said repeatedly he wants to repeal. As we’ve noted several times, the Obama Justice Department entered a controversial legal brief last week defending DOMA—which included language and implications that irked many of Obama’s top gay supporters. At today’s briefing, ABC’s Jake Tapper asked Gibbs if Obama stands by his Justice Department’s legal brief in the case. Here’s the exchange:
Q Does the President stand by the legal brief that the Justice Department filed last week that argued in favor of the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act?
MR. GIBBS: Well, Jake, as you know, the Justice Department is charged with upholding the law of the land, even though the President believes that that law should be repealed.
Q I understand that. But a lot of legal experts say that the brief didn't have to be as comprehensive and make all the arguments that it made, such as comparing same-sex unions to incestuous ones in one controversial paragraph that's upset a lot of the President's supporters. Does the President stand by the content, the arguments made in that brief?
MR. GIBBS: Well, again, it's the President's Justice Department. And again, we have the role of upholding the law of the land while the President has stated and will work with Congress to change that law.
To sum up, this isn’t Obama. It’s his Justice Department, and they are following the law. That’s an interesting argument. We get the point about enforcing the law, but is Gibbs implying the president has zero influence over his own Justice Department and what they pursue or emphasize in their legal briefs? Asked later if Obama had actually seen the DOMA brief before it was filed, Gibbs said he didn’t know and would check. Ditto on a follow-up on whether Obama would “endorse” the actual "language" in the brief.