Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
The Gaggle Blog - Newsweek.com
  • Dems Might Be the Party of the Rich, But What About the Middle Class?

    David A. Graham | Oct 14, 2009 04:55 PM

    USA Today presents some interesting, if perhaps not groundbreaking, numbers on socioeconomic representation in Congress today. According to the report, which is based on analysis of census data,

    Democratic members of the House of Representatives now represent most of the nation's wealthiest people, a sharp turnaround from the long-standing dominance that Republicans have held over affluent districts ... Democrats now represent 57% of the 4.8 million households that had incomes of $200,000 or more in 2008. In 2005, Republicans represented 55% of those affluent households.

    The change in distribution of seats in the House is roughly the same size as the shift the article describes—although USA Today's data doesn't connect any dots between the two. Still, it goes without saying that some of the shift is a natural product of Democrats' electoral gains in the 2008 elections, in which they picked up 21 seats.

    More
  • Resigners Anonymous? We Compare Paula and Palin

    Daniel Stone | Aug 6, 2009 01:40 PM
    Chris Pizzello/AP (left); AL Grillo/AP

    We here at the Gaggle do politics, but we couldn't help take note of Paula Abdul's recent departure as a judge on American Idol after eight seasons. The staging of her leave looks oddly familiar, we thought to ourselves. After all, it was only a month ago that we witnessed an equally bizarre and sudden exit of another big player in her own field: Sarah Palin. It turns out, both women and their resignations are far more similar than they are different. Let's pick apart the comparison:

    More
  • Advertisement
  • Culvahouse on Palin: Impressive, but Not Ready

    Holly Bailey | Apr 20, 2009 01:00 PM
    Why did John McCain really pick Sarah Palin to be his running mate? We’ve heard from McCain and lots of his former campaign staffers on the subject, but on Friday, the man who was actually in charge of vetting McCain’s potential running mates finally spoke out. In a speech before the Republican National Lawyers Association, Arthur Culvahouse talked publicly for the first time about his work for McCain and what he told the Arizona senator about Palin. (The full video, courtesy C-SPAN is here.) The headline: Culvahouse liked her, but thought she wouldn’t be ready. "I think she would have been a great vice president. So I told John, she wouldn't have been ready on January 20th -- I don't think many people would. Maybe only a Dick Cheney who has been in the White House and has been Secretary of Defense would" be ready to take over the presidency," Culvahouse said Friday. "But she had a lot of capacity. The mistake I made -- and we've laughed about it since -- after giving him that advice, he said, 'Well, what's your bottom line?' I said, 'John. High risk, high reward.' And his response, ‘You shouldn't have told me that, I've been a risk-taker all of my life.'" More
  • Remember Those Inaccurate New Hampshire Polls? New Report Explains What Happened.

    Katie Connolly | Mar 30, 2009 01:58 PM

    Pollsters around the country would remember the 2008 New Hampshire primary as a low point for their profession. Contrary to nearly every poll, Hillary Clinton pulled out a surprise upset victory over Barack Obama, who had just walloped her in Iowa. Based on available polling, very few people predicted Clinton's success. Your Gaggler was covering the Romney campaign at the time, and remembers Romney staffers betting not on who would win the Democratic primary, but on how much Obama would win by.  In the subsequent days reporters and politicos alike scratched their heads and offered theories about what the pollsters did wrong. Today, after many months of research, the American Association for Public Opinion Research is out with a detailed report describing what they believe went wrong. Mark Blumenthal over at Pollster.com summarizes some of the key findings:

    In other words, what happened in New Hampshire wasn't one thing, it was a likely lot of small things, all introducing errors in the same direction. Various methodological challenges or shortcomings that might ordinarily produce offsetting variation in polls instead combined to throw them all off in the same direction. Polling's "perfect storm" did not materialize this past fall, but that label seems more apt for the New Hampshire polling debacle.

    The report also produces evidence that rules out a number of prominent theories, among them the so-called "Bradley Effect." The authors claim they saw "no evidence that white respondents over-represented their support for Obama," and thus, no evidence of "latent racism" benefiting Clinton. Fair enough, but they do report evidence of a "social desirability effect" that led respondents to report "significantly greater" support for Obama "when when the interviewer is black than when he or she is white" (although Obama still led by smaller margins among when interviewers were white -- see pp 55-59 of the pdf report).

    You can download the full report from the AAPOR's website.


  • Former McCain Adviser Endorses Same Sex Marriage

    Holly Bailey | Mar 27, 2009 02:34 PM
    Steve Schmidt, who was John McCain’s chief political strategist during the campaign, has largely stayed out of sight since the election. He went back to California, where he lives with his wife and kids, and went back to work as a consultant, though he no longer formally advises political candidates. During the campaign, Schmidt made no secret of the fact that his personal views often ran far to the left of his party. In an interview this week with the Washington Blade, Schmidt, whose only sister is gay, came out in favor of marriage rights for same-sex couples and called for the Republican Party to be more inclusive of gays and lesbians. “I am personally supportive of (marriage) equality for gay couples, and I believe it will happen over time,” Schmidt said. “I think that more and more Americans are insistent that, at a minimum, gay couples should be treated with respect and when they see a political party trying to stigmatize a group of people who are hardworking, who play by the rules, who raise decent families, they’re troubled by it.” The former McCain strategist told the paper that he voted against Proposition 8, which ended same-sex marriage in California. Schmidt, who will speak at next month’s Log Cabin Republican convention in Washington, said he believes the GOP has been “shrinking party” in recent years because of intolerance. “One of the most tragic things in the world (is) when people are closeted and are denied their sexuality and this incredibly important part of their lives and the destructive potential of that action,” Schmidt said. “I’ve come to believe over time that, as Dick Cheney said, freedom for everybody means freedom for everybody.”
  • I Am Definitely Not Running. Maybe. Unless I Am. In Which Case, I Would Like My Adviser Back

    Holly Bailey | Jul 23, 2007 12:24 PM

    Is Newt Gingrich running for president? The former House speaker has said he won't make a final decision about a campaign for the White House until this fall. But here's a big hint that Newt might be out of the game: GOP strategist Rich Galen, one of Gingrich's longest and closest advisers, announced this weekend that he's signed on as a senior advisor to former Sen. Fred Thompson, who is considering his own bid for the White House. "Assuming he gets into the race, I think Fred Thompson may well be the best combination of insider-outsider experience and possess the new kind of ideas that don't exist in either party," Galen told CNN, where he has appeared as an on-air political analyst. It's unlikely that Galen would jump to another candidate without Gingrich's blessing. Galen was Gingrich's top communications aide in the House and has been an unpaid adviser and friend since then. Last December, Galen appeared as a surrogate for a prospective Gingrich 2008 bid on a Washington panel organized by National Journal's Hotline to discuss the GOP presidential race. Indeed, the pair is so close that Galen has been considered a go-to guy for reporters looking to read the tea leaves about Newt's ambitions. Last week, Gingrich told the Associated Press that a Thompson bid would make him less likely to join the 2008 race. "If Fred Thompson runs and he does well, then I think that makes it easier for me not to run," Gingrich said. But as he prone to do, Newt still left the door open a crack, telling AP, "On the other hand, just given with you've seen with (John) McCain the last few months, how can you predict?" As for Thompson, it's anybody's guess at this point when the former Law & Order star will throw his hat in the ring. His advisers initially said he'd be in the race by mid-July, then pushed it back to August. Now rumors have Thompson entering the race by Labor Day- maybe. One thing's for sure: Fred's busy raising money for his exploratory bid--as certain a sign as any that he's really planning to run. He's scheduled to hold his first big-dollar Washington fundraiser next week.


  • Rudy's Southern Strategy

    Jonathan Darman | Jul 12, 2007 04:31 PM

    Contributed by Jonathan Darman and Arian Campo-Flores

    When Judi Giuliani referred to her "big testosterone-factor husband" in the pages of Harper's Bazaar in February, her remarks were widely ridiculed and seen as evidence that the former New York mayor's new wife might not be quite ready for prime time. But after Louisiana Sen. David Vitter, Giuliani's top Southern conservative ally, admitted he'd solicited prostitutes from the famed "D.C. Madam," Judi's description seems remarkably apt. The testosterone factor may be at play, but not in quite the way his wife intended--and it could wind up as one of the biggest impediments to Giuliani's winning the GOP nomination for the White House.

    More
  • My Friends, I Believe We Will Still Win The White House Just As Surely As I Believe We Will Still Win In Iraq

    Holly Bailey | Jul 12, 2007 03:32 PM
    There's more bad news for John McCain's struggling presidential campaign. On the heels of dismal fund-raising numbers, McCain's two top advisers--campaign manager Terry Nelson and longtime political strategist John Weaver--have abruptly left the campaign.... More
  • This Campaign is About More Than Just How Much Money I Raised This Quarter. It's About How Much More Money I Raised Than Last Quarter

    Samuel Stein | Jul 5, 2007 10:49 AM
    No one said wining the White House was going to be cheap. But at the rate the 2008 presidential race is going, it's becoming increasingly expensive just to lose. Just take a look at the second quarter fundraising totals made public earlier this week. As newsworthy as Barack Obama pulling in more than $32 million dollars in new donations was Senator John McCain's "disappointing" $11.2 million--a figure that has some political pros ready to consign McCain's campaign to the obit desk.

    The pundits are pawing through the numbers, trying to make sense of "what it all means." What it means is, if your name is Clinton, Obama or Giuliani, you're feeling pretty good. Everyone else, not so good. And Democrats are feeling better than Republicans: All told, Republicans were out-raised by Democrats by nearly 50 percent: $144.3 million to $101.7 million.

    So what does it all mean? Take a look at the numbers of the top candidates and decide for yourself. This ain't rocket science, after all.
    More
  • Yes, Mr. McCain. It Does Seem to Be as Bad as It Looks

    Holly Bailey | Jul 2, 2007 03:42 PM
    Could things get any worse for John McCain? On the heels of last weekend's second quarter presidential fund-raising deadline, the Arizona senator announced today that he'd raised just $11 million during the last three months. That's even less than what he raised during the first quarter, when he trailed Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani by millions. Back then, McCain blamed himself for not setting up enough fundraisers so that people could donate money to him. But after months of McCain spending in upwards of three to four days a week soliciting funds, that can no longer be his excuse. The most shocking number however isn't what he raised, but how much he spent. McCain's campaign said Monday they have just $2 million in the bank, which means he's likely spent more than any other presidential hopeful in the race, Democrat or Republican. As a result, his campaign announced serious cost-cutting measures. As many as 50 staffers will be laid off and many of his senior aides will work without pay. Among those working for free until things turn around: Terry Nelson, McCain's campaign manager. It's a surprising turn of events for a guy who was once considered the Republican to beat in 2008. Team McCain originally believed they could raise $100 million this year, but in a conference call with reporters, Nelson today bluntly admitted they were wrong. More
  • Dear Mom And Dad, Having A Great Time Out Here. Met A Lot Of New Friends. Please Send Money

    Holly Bailey | Jun 28, 2007 03:40 PM

    It's that time of year again, folks. June 30 is the second-quarter fund-raising deadline for 2008 presidential hopefuls, and the big question heading into Saturday is how much money the campaigns have raised and spent during the last three months. Technically, the candidates don't have to tell us until July 15, when their disclosure reports are due at the Federal Election Commission. But if their handling of the first-quarter numbers is any indication, the candidates will probably brag about how much they've raised well before the deadline, possibly as early as next week.

    But "brag" might be a strong word. Already many candidates are playing the expectations game--as in, uh oh, maybe we didn't do as well as we hoped. Some of this is smoke and mirrors. Hillary Clinton types, for example, are spreading word that she might be beaten by Barack Obama again when it comes to primary fund-raising, while Obama aides, off the record of course, are putting the onus on Hillary, talking a sad story about how tough it is to compete against the Clinton money juggernaut. The truth is, we just won't know until we see the numbers.

    More
  • And Ron Paul, He's Like A Happy Meal

    Holly Bailey | Jun 13, 2007 12:07 PM
    John McCain’s campaign has had a rough go lately--at least that’s what his 2008 rivals would have you think. First, there have been the whispers about money, that McCain won’t even match the somewhat lackluster $12 million he raised during the first three months of the year by the time candidates file their second-quarter numbers. (His campaign says it’s not so, that they are on target to raise more. The truth is, absent some leak of finance records, we really won’t know until after June 30--the second quarter deadline.) There’s the talk about supporters jumping ship en masse for Fred Thompson--something that hasn’t really happened yet. Perhaps the only real disappointment that is confirmed is McCain’s clear slide in the polls lately. He’s down in Iowa and New Hampshire and took a big hit in this week’s Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll, which found him ranked third behind Thompson among likely GOP voters and just two points above Mitt Romney, a guy whose poll numbers haven’t kept up with his pace as the GOP’s fund-raising frontrunner. But, as the New York Times reports today, Romney seems to be picking up steam because he’s spending millions of dollars on advertising. And in this story is perhaps another McCain problem: The head-scratching analogy. More
  • And If You Think About It, Carmela Is Kind of Like A Budget Reauthorization Supplemental

    Holly Bailey | Jun 11, 2007 02:27 PM

    Your Gaggler could probably spend all day long talking about last night's series finale of "The Sopranos." And truth be told, she pretty much has. (Sorry, boss.) We won't even begin to pick through what it all meant: Did Tony die? Did Tony live? And what was up with that cat? (Adriana lives, people!) Suffice to say, one of the best moments of the night had to have been A.J.'s reaction upon seeing his $30,000 SUV explode in flames because he parked it on leaves during an impromptu hook-up with a high school sweetie. According to A.J., it was just as well. "We need to break our dependence on foreign oil," he declared. President Bush couldn't have said it better. (And Bush even made a cameo--dancing. As did Karl Rove. Talk about a lasting legacy.) At least we're not the only ones consumed. Even the folks cruising the Free Republic forums have found a way to bring the debate full circle. "There is no way that Tony Soprano can be killed," one Free Republic reader wrote. "He is like immigration reform, too much at stake for too many people."

    Update: Hillary gets in on the action:


    More
  • Want a Challenge? Try Supporting a Candidate Other Than Mitt Romney at BYU. Just Try It.

    Newsweek Interns | Jun 11, 2007 02:24 PM

    By Ruth Olson

    It would be stating the obvious to say that Mormon presidential candidate Mitt Romney has a lot of support at Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah. But the former Massachusetts governor isn't the only pol drawing support on the campus of 27,000 full-time undergraduate students, 98 percent of them members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

    David Garber, a BYU student from Virginia, recently started a club to promote the candidacy of Republican Ron Paul. The group isn't an official campus club yet, so his activities have been limited. Garber admits it has been somewhat difficult getting started; so far he has half a dozen members in his group. "We're pretty optimistic," says Garber, who believes Paul's policies are a better fit with mainstream Utah values than Romney's.

    Lauren Clough, who's heading up a group in support of Democratic candidate Barack Obama, says the school administration has been supportive, but that doesn't always hold true of the students. "It is hard, and it can be frustrating, because people can be mean about it," she says. But then again, she said, she's always liked a challenge.

    More
  • Aloha, Barack Obama! Hawaiians Love You--Except for Those Who Support Hillary

    Newsweek Interns | Jun 8, 2007 02:35 PM

    By Noelle Chun

    There weren't any advertisements. And yet, one warm Saturday morning in May, in the middle of the Pacific, an unpublicized organizational meeting drew some 150 people to a sticky middle-school classroom. But who needs publicity when the project is about Hawaii's favorite son, Barack Obama, who was born in the Islands and graduated from high school in Honolulu.

    But the Obama camp might not want to rest on its laurels. Among Hawaii's congressional delegation, nominee support is fractured. The state's senior senator, Daniel Inouye, announced two weeks ago he would support Hillary Clinton. Rep. Neil Abercrombie is supporting Obama, but Sen. Daniel Akaka remains quiet on the matter. "The Democrats in Hawaii are less and less cohesive," says Jim Shon, a political analyst and former state legislator.

    Still many are pumped up about Obama's Hawaiian roots. "What's exciting is this idea of aloha being brought to the world," says supporter Lynne Johnson of Honolulu. "After growing up in Hawaii and Indonesia, Barack represents that tolerance and inclusiveness and mutual understanding."

    More