-
David A. Graham
|
Oct 14, 2009 04:55 PM
USA Today presents some interesting, if perhaps not
groundbreaking, numbers on socioeconomic representation in Congress
today. According to the report, which is based on analysis of census data,
Democratic members of the House of Representatives now represent
most of the nation's wealthiest people, a sharp turnaround from the
long-standing dominance that Republicans have held over affluent
districts ... Democrats now represent 57% of the 4.8 million households
that had incomes of $200,000 or more in 2008. In 2005, Republicans
represented 55% of those affluent households.
The change in distribution of seats in the House is roughly the same size as the shift the article describes—although USA Today's
data doesn't connect any dots between the two. Still, it goes without
saying that some of the shift is a natural product of Democrats'
electoral gains in the 2008 elections, in which they picked up 21 seats.
More
-
Daniel Stone
|
Aug 6, 2009 01:40 PM

Chris Pizzello/AP (left); AL Grillo/AP
We here at the Gaggle do politics, but we couldn't help take note of
Paula Abdul's recent departure as a judge on American Idol after eight
seasons. The staging of her leave looks oddly familiar, we thought to
ourselves. After all, it was only a month ago that we witnessed an
equally bizarre and sudden exit of another big player in her own field:
Sarah Palin. It turns out, both women and their resignations are far
more similar than they are different. Let's pick apart the comparison:
More
-
Holly Bailey
|
Apr 20, 2009 01:00 PM
Why did John McCain really pick Sarah Palin to be his running mate? We’ve heard from McCain and lots of his former campaign staffers on the subject, but on Friday, the man who was actually in charge of vetting McCain’s potential running mates finally spoke out. In a speech before the Republican National Lawyers Association, Arthur Culvahouse talked publicly for the first time about his work for McCain and what he told the Arizona senator about Palin. (The full video, courtesy C-SPAN is here.) The headline: Culvahouse liked her, but thought she wouldn’t be ready. "I think she would have been a great vice president. So I told John, she wouldn't have been ready on January 20th -- I don't think many people would. Maybe only a Dick Cheney who has been in the White House and has been Secretary of Defense would" be ready to take over the presidency," Culvahouse said Friday. "But she had a lot of capacity. The mistake I made -- and we've laughed about it since -- after giving him that advice, he said, 'Well, what's your bottom line?' I said, 'John. High risk, high reward.' And his response, ‘You shouldn't have told me that, I've been a risk-taker all of my life.'"
More
-
Katie Connolly
|
Mar 30, 2009 01:58 PM
Pollsters around the country would remember the 2008 New Hampshire primary as a low point for their profession. Contrary to nearly every poll, Hillary Clinton pulled out a surprise upset victory over Barack Obama, who had just walloped her in Iowa. Based on available polling, very few people predicted Clinton's success. Your Gaggler was covering the Romney campaign at the time, and remembers Romney staffers betting not on who would win the Democratic primary, but on how much Obama would win by. In the subsequent days reporters and politicos alike scratched their heads and offered theories about what the pollsters did wrong. Today, after many months of research, the American Association for Public Opinion Research is out with a detailed report describing what they believe went wrong. Mark Blumenthal over at Pollster.com summarizes some of the key findings:
In other words, what happened in New Hampshire wasn't one thing, it
was a likely lot of small things, all introducing errors in the same
direction. Various methodological challenges or shortcomings that might
ordinarily produce offsetting variation in polls instead combined to
throw them all off in the same direction. Polling's "perfect storm" did
not materialize this past fall, but that label seems more apt for the
New Hampshire polling debacle.
The report also produces evidence that rules out a number of
prominent theories, among them the so-called "Bradley Effect." The
authors claim they saw "no evidence that white respondents
over-represented their support for Obama," and thus, no evidence of
"latent racism" benefiting Clinton. Fair enough, but they do report
evidence of a "social desirability effect" that led respondents to
report "significantly greater" support for Obama "when when the
interviewer is black than when he or she is white" (although Obama
still led by smaller margins among when interviewers were white -- see
pp 55-59 of the pdf report).
You can download the full report from the AAPOR's website.
-
Holly Bailey
|
Mar 27, 2009 02:34 PM
Steve Schmidt, who was John McCain’s chief political strategist during the campaign, has largely stayed out of sight since the election. He went back to California, where he lives with his wife and kids, and went back to work as a consultant, though he no longer formally advises political candidates. During the campaign, Schmidt made no secret of the fact that his personal views often ran far to the left of his party. In an interview this week with the Washington Blade, Schmidt, whose only sister is gay, came out in favor of marriage rights for same-sex couples and called for the Republican Party to be more inclusive of gays and lesbians. “I am personally supportive of (marriage) equality for gay couples, and I believe it will happen over time,” Schmidt said. “I think that more and more Americans are insistent that, at a minimum, gay couples should be treated with respect and when they see a political party trying to stigmatize a group of people who are hardworking, who play by the rules, who raise decent families, they’re troubled by it.” The former McCain strategist told the paper that he voted against Proposition 8, which ended same-sex marriage in California. Schmidt, who will speak at next month’s Log Cabin Republican convention in Washington, said he believes the GOP has been “shrinking party” in recent years because of intolerance. “One of the most tragic things in the world (is) when people are closeted and are denied their sexuality and this incredibly important part of their lives and the destructive potential of that action,” Schmidt said. “I’ve come to believe over time that, as Dick Cheney said, freedom for everybody means freedom for everybody.”
-
Holly Bailey
|
Jul 23, 2007 12:24 PM
Is Newt Gingrich running for president? The former House speaker has said he won't make a final decision about a campaign for the White House until this fall. But here's a big hint that Newt might be out of the game: GOP strategist Rich Galen, one of Gingrich's longest and closest advisers, announced this weekend that he's signed on as a senior advisor to former Sen. Fred Thompson, who is considering his own bid for the White House. "Assuming he gets into the race, I think Fred Thompson may well be the best combination of insider-outsider experience and possess the new kind of ideas that don't exist in either party," Galen told CNN, where he has appeared as an on-air political analyst. It's unlikely that Galen would jump to another candidate without Gingrich's blessing. Galen was Gingrich's top communications aide in the House and has been an unpaid adviser and friend since then. Last December, Galen appeared as a surrogate for a prospective Gingrich 2008 bid on a Washington panel organized by National Journal's Hotline to discuss the GOP presidential race. Indeed, the pair is so close that Galen has been considered a go-to guy for reporters looking to read the tea leaves about Newt's ambitions. Last week, Gingrich told the Associated Press that a Thompson bid would make him less likely to join the 2008 race. "If Fred Thompson runs and he does well, then I think that makes it easier for me not to run," Gingrich said. But as he prone to do, Newt still left the door open a crack, telling AP, "On the other hand, just given with you've seen with (John) McCain the last few months, how can you predict?" As for Thompson, it's anybody's guess at this point when the former Law & Order star will throw his hat in the ring. His advisers initially said he'd be in the race by mid-July, then pushed it back to August. Now rumors have Thompson entering the race by Labor Day- maybe. One thing's for sure: Fred's busy raising money for his exploratory bid--as certain a sign as any that he's really planning to run. He's scheduled to hold his first big-dollar Washington fundraiser next week.
-
Jonathan Darman
|
Jul 12, 2007 04:31 PM
Contributed by Jonathan Darman and Arian Campo-Flores
When
Judi Giuliani referred to her "big testosterone-factor husband" in the
pages of Harper's Bazaar in February, her remarks were widely ridiculed
and seen as evidence that the former New York mayor's new wife might
not be quite ready for prime time. But after Louisiana Sen. David
Vitter, Giuliani's top Southern conservative ally, admitted he'd
solicited prostitutes from the famed "D.C. Madam," Judi's description
seems remarkably apt. The testosterone factor may be at play, but not
in quite the way his wife intended--and it could wind up as one of the
biggest impediments to Giuliani's winning the GOP nomination for the
White House.
More
-
Holly Bailey
|
Jul 12, 2007 03:32 PM
There's more bad news for John McCain's struggling presidential campaign. On the heels of dismal fund-raising numbers, McCain's two top advisers--campaign manager Terry Nelson and longtime political strategist John Weaver--have abruptly left the campaign....
More
-
Samuel Stein
|
Jul 5, 2007 10:49 AM
No one said wining the White House was going to be cheap. But at the
rate the 2008 presidential race is going, it's becoming increasingly
expensive just to lose. Just take a look at the second quarter
fundraising totals made public earlier this week. As newsworthy as
Barack Obama pulling in more than $32 million dollars in new donations
was Senator John McCain's "disappointing" $11.2 million--a figure that
has some political pros ready to consign McCain's campaign to the obit
desk.
The pundits are pawing through the numbers, trying to
make sense of "what it all means." What it means is, if your name is
Clinton, Obama or Giuliani, you're feeling pretty good. Everyone else,
not so good. And Democrats are feeling better than Republicans: All
told, Republicans were out-raised by Democrats by nearly 50 percent:
$144.3 million to $101.7 million.
So what does it all mean? Take
a look at the numbers of the top candidates and decide for yourself.
This ain't rocket science, after all.
More
-
Holly Bailey
|
Jul 2, 2007 03:42 PM
Could things get any worse for John McCain? On the heels of last
weekend's second quarter presidential fund-raising deadline, the
Arizona senator announced today that he'd raised just $11 million
during the last three months. That's even less than what he raised
during the first quarter, when he trailed Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani
by millions. Back then, McCain blamed himself for not setting up enough
fundraisers so that people could donate money to him. But after months
of McCain spending in upwards of three to four days a week soliciting
funds, that can no longer be his excuse. The most shocking number
however isn't what he raised, but how much he spent. McCain's campaign
said Monday they have just $2 million in the bank, which means he's
likely spent more than any other presidential hopeful in the race,
Democrat or Republican. As a result, his campaign announced serious
cost-cutting measures. As many as 50 staffers will be laid off and many
of his senior aides will work without pay. Among those working for free
until things turn around: Terry Nelson, McCain's campaign manager. It's
a surprising turn of events for a guy who was once considered the
Republican to beat in 2008. Team McCain originally believed they could
raise $100 million this year, but in a conference call with reporters,
Nelson today bluntly admitted they were wrong.
More
-
Holly Bailey
|
Jun 28, 2007 03:40 PM
It's that time of year again, folks. June 30 is the second-quarter
fund-raising deadline for 2008 presidential hopefuls, and the big
question heading into Saturday is how much money the campaigns have
raised and spent during the last three months. Technically, the
candidates don't have to tell us until July 15, when their disclosure
reports are due at the Federal Election Commission. But if their
handling of the first-quarter numbers is any indication, the candidates
will probably brag about how much they've raised well before the
deadline, possibly as early as next week.
But "brag" might be a strong word. Already many candidates are
playing the expectations game--as in, uh oh, maybe we didn't do as well
as we hoped. Some of this is smoke and mirrors. Hillary Clinton types,
for example, are spreading word that she might be beaten by Barack
Obama again when it comes to primary fund-raising, while Obama aides,
off the record of course, are putting the onus on Hillary, talking a
sad story about how tough it is to compete against the Clinton money
juggernaut. The truth is, we just won't know until we see the numbers.
More
-
Holly Bailey
|
Jun 13, 2007 12:07 PM
John McCain’s campaign has had a rough go lately--at least that’s what
his 2008 rivals would have you think. First, there have been the
whispers about money, that McCain won’t even match the somewhat
lackluster $12 million he raised during the first three months of the
year by the time candidates file their second-quarter numbers. (His
campaign says it’s not so, that they are on target to raise more. The
truth is, absent some leak of finance records, we really won’t know
until after June 30--the second quarter deadline.) There’s the talk
about supporters jumping ship en masse for Fred Thompson--something
that hasn’t really happened yet. Perhaps the only real disappointment
that is confirmed is McCain’s clear slide in the polls lately. He’s
down in Iowa and New Hampshire and took a big hit in this week’s Los
Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll, which found him ranked third behind
Thompson among likely GOP voters and just two points above Mitt Romney,
a guy whose poll numbers haven’t kept up with his pace as the GOP’s
fund-raising frontrunner.
But, as the New York Times reports today, Romney seems to be picking
up steam because he’s spending millions of dollars on advertising. And
in this story is perhaps another McCain problem: The head-scratching
analogy.
More
-
Holly Bailey
|
Jun 11, 2007 02:27 PM
Your Gaggler could probably spend all day long talking about last
night's series finale of "The Sopranos." And truth be told, she pretty
much has. (Sorry, boss.) We won't even begin to pick through what it
all meant: Did Tony die? Did Tony live? And what was up with that cat?
(Adriana lives, people!) Suffice to say, one of the best moments of the
night had to have been A.J.'s reaction upon seeing his $30,000 SUV
explode in flames because he parked it on leaves during an impromptu
hook-up with a high school sweetie. According to A.J., it was just as
well. "We need to break our dependence on foreign oil," he declared.
President Bush couldn't have said it better. (And Bush even made a
cameo--dancing. As did Karl Rove. Talk about a lasting legacy.) At
least we're not the only ones consumed. Even the folks cruising the
Free Republic forums have found a way to bring the debate full circle.
"There is no way that Tony Soprano can be killed," one Free Republic reader wrote. "He is like immigration reform, too much at stake for too many people."
Update: Hillary gets in on the action:
More
-
Newsweek Interns
|
Jun 11, 2007 02:24 PM
By Ruth Olson
It would be stating the obvious
to say that Mormon presidential candidate Mitt Romney has a lot of
support at Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah. But the former
Massachusetts governor isn't the only pol drawing support on the campus
of 27,000 full-time undergraduate students, 98 percent of them members
of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
David Garber,
a BYU student from Virginia, recently started a club to promote the
candidacy of Republican Ron Paul. The group isn't an official campus
club yet, so his activities have been limited. Garber admits it has
been somewhat difficult getting started; so far he has half a dozen
members in his group. "We're pretty optimistic," says Garber, who
believes Paul's policies are a better fit with mainstream Utah values
than Romney's.
Lauren Clough, who's heading up a group in
support of Democratic candidate Barack Obama, says the school
administration has been supportive, but that doesn't always hold true
of the students. "It is hard, and it can be frustrating, because people
can be mean about it," she says. But then again, she said, she's always
liked a challenge.
More
-
Newsweek Interns
|
Jun 8, 2007 02:35 PM
By Noelle Chun
There weren't any advertisements. And yet, one warm Saturday morning in
May, in the middle of the Pacific, an unpublicized organizational
meeting drew some 150 people to a sticky middle-school classroom. But
who needs publicity when the project is about Hawaii's favorite son,
Barack Obama, who was born in the Islands and graduated from high
school in Honolulu.
But
the Obama camp might not want to rest on its laurels. Among Hawaii's
congressional delegation, nominee support is fractured. The state's
senior senator, Daniel Inouye, announced two weeks ago he would support
Hillary Clinton. Rep. Neil Abercrombie is supporting Obama, but Sen.
Daniel Akaka remains quiet on the matter. "The Democrats in Hawaii are
less and less cohesive," says Jim Shon, a political analyst and former
state legislator.
Still many are pumped up about Obama's
Hawaiian roots. "What's exciting is this idea of aloha being brought to
the world," says supporter Lynne Johnson of Honolulu. "After growing up
in Hawaii and Indonesia, Barack represents that tolerance and
inclusiveness and mutual understanding."
More