http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/thegaggle/archive/2009/07/15/top-5-moments-from-sotomayor-s-third-day.aspxSonia Sotomayor knows exactly what she must do to be confirmed, and that's very little. If she doesn't say too much, she can't muddy the wide respect across party lines that all but guarantee her a spot on the high court. But even if legal experts aren'tenCommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Debug Build: 2.18)http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/thegaggle/archive/2009/07/15/top-5-moments-from-sotomayor-s-third-day.aspx#1084244Thu, 16 Jul 2009 02:58:06 GMT544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:1084244carlyt<p>The moments that stand out are the embarrassing (and sometimes stupid) questions the Republicans are asking Sotomayor. &nbsp;They should ban Sessions from these hearings. Why is this guy a Senator? there is a related post at <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://iamsoannoyed.com/?page_id=588">http://iamsoannoyed.com/?page_id=588</a></p> Blog: The Gagglehttp://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/thegaggle/archive/2009/07/15/top-5-moments-from-sotomayor-s-third-day.aspx#1084673Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:33:23 GMT544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:1084673Hannah B<p>The most important thing to remember is exactly how Sessions, Graham, Coburn, Kyl, etc. found it the best use of everyone's time to question ad nauseum about the Latina comment. &nbsp;This was an obvious display of exactly why the Repubs have favorable ratings in the 20's. &nbsp;What a colossal waste of time and effort. &nbsp; I find it impossible to understand why this rated 3 days worth rather than the 2-3 hours (at most) worth of time it warranted. &nbsp;Did they expect a new revelation on the 20th time asked after the 19th? &nbsp;This was somehow so much more important than her 17 years worth of cases to examine in their viewpoint? &nbsp;Then there was the disrespectful and condescending remarks and lectures not to mention blatant racism for ALL to see. &nbsp;Very pitiful indeed!!!!! </p> Blog: The Gaggle