-
David A. Graham
|
Feb 9, 2010 03:45 PM
Fred Kaplan, Slate's "War Stories" columnist, is usually right on, but his column on Sarah Palin yesterday
was a bit of a dud. Charging right out of the gate, Kaplan asks: "Are
there any Republican grown-ups out there, and, if there are, will they
ever start coming to the aid of their party? That sentence could segue
into any number of topics, but the one at hand is Sarah Palin."
Where to start? Certainly, many liberals would be delighted to see a
phalanx of moderate Republicans condemning Palin—just as many
conservatives were delighted to see moderate Democrats such as Evan
Bayh lashing out at President Obama in the wake of Scott Brown's
victory in the special election for senator in Massachusetts. But
Palin's rhetoric—and that of like-minded leaders—seems to be making political hay for the GOP, at least in the short term.
More to the point, though, Kaplan is simply wrong: there are "Republican grown-ups" who haven't been shy about criticizing Palin.
More
-
Patrice Wingert
|
Feb 9, 2010 03:38 PM
When Michelle Obama became first lady, she stressed that her "No. 1 job" would be "first mom." Following through on that focus, today at the White House, she elevated her personal concern for her own kids' health and eating habits into a massive national campaign aimed at solving the U.S. epidemic of childhood obesity in a generation.
Calling the issue "one of the most serious threats to their future," Obama noted that childhood obesity rates have tripled in the last three decades and that the excess weight kids are carrying these days increases the risk of developing diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure, cancer, and asthma. As a result, Obama said, she had "great concern" that too many of today's kids were on track to live shorter and less healthy lives than their parents, even though the problem is "so imminently solvable."
Read the rest of the story on the Human Condition blog.
-
Sarah Kliff
|
Feb 9, 2010 02:20 PM
As snowmaggedon continues to wreak havoc on the Capitol, the House has suspended all votes through Friday. The snow-week decision is rife with opportunities to mock the government’s uncanny ability to use any and all excuses to justify inaction. One editorial cartoon, a drawing of our nation’s capital blanketed in snow, comes with the tagline: “where every day is a snow day.”
But if you want to talk about really egregious government shutdowns explained with implausible excuses, just take a look at our neighbors to the north (incidentally, this Gaggler's home country): using the Olympics as a partial justification, the Canadian Parliament is in the middle of a two- month shutdown.
More
-
Sarah Kliff
|
Feb 9, 2010 12:40 PM
Republican support for Obama’s handling of health-care reform is at a
mere 7 percent. The gap between Republican and Democratic support—67
points—is the largest for all issues that Gallup polled on, which
includes terrorism (52-point gap on POTUS support) and the economy
(56-point gap).
Again, this is a shift from August: back then,
the economy was the most polarizing issue, with a 71-point gap between
Democrats and Republicans. More than any other foreign or domestic
policy, health-care reform has the dubious distinction of the most
polarizing policy in terms of how you view Obama.
More
-
Ben Adler
|
Feb 9, 2010 09:00 AM
I've been hard on congressional Republicans recently for pandering to voters' ignorance by offering politically appealing but irresponsible slogans instead of a credible conservative vision of how to meet America's challenges, even those they harp on Obama for failing to address, such as our rising budget deficits. So, it is only fair that I praise Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wisc) for coming forward with a proposal that could actually reduce long term deficits.
Ryan would to do so by essentially eliminating Medicare (and privatizing Social Security). Everyone under 55 today, would not get covered by the U.S. government. Instead they would get vouchers with which to buy health insurance upon turning 65. You can quickly surmise what this would lead to: insurers, with a customer base that is high-risk, would either charge rates well above what the vouchers provide, and/or offer only bare bones service for the cost of a voucher. The result: seniors who are uninsured or under-insured. Ultimately, seniors would die as a result, as younger Americans who lack insurance do now.
This is a conservative vision of government, and you cannot expect Democrats to embrace it. But if the Republicans ran on such a proposal and won control of Congress and the White House they could claim a legitimate mandate to enact it.
Alas, Republicans are all but certain not to run any such program.
More
-
Mark Hosenball
|
Feb 9, 2010 06:30 AM
Maybe it's time to stop some of the name-calling over counterterrorism
policy and start checking the facts. As the debate over Obama
administration counterterrorism policies has heated up in the wake of
the failed Christmas Day underpants airplane bombing, prominent
Republicans, ranging from leading senators to a former press secretary
for George W. Bush, have attacked the current administration for
claiming that hundreds of terrorist suspects had been successfully
prosecuted through the civilian court system during Bush's presidency.
But it turns out that the Obama administration's claims do appear to be
well documented—assuming that an official budget request sent to
Congress by Bush's last attorney general was truthful itself.
For the full story, visit Declassfied.
-
Eleanor Clift
|
Feb 8, 2010 05:25 PM
John Murtha was Nancy Pelosi's friend and mentor, and his backing her for leader over Steny Hoyer, a longtime insider player in the Democratic caucus, gave her the street creds she needed to win as the first woman to hold that high a position in what was an old boys' club. A gruff former combat Marine officer, Murtha provided political cover for Pelosi and other left-wing Democrats in their opposition to the Iraq war. After having initially supported the war, Murtha became an outspoken opponent, calling for immediate withdrawal of U.S. forces in 2005. As a once reliable Bush administration ally, his defection signaled the growing disaffection with Bush's war policies. Murtha's long history of pro-military votes and close alliance with the military helped rebuff Republican charges that Pelosi and other anti-war Democrats were endangering national security.
More
-
Katie Connolly
|
Feb 8, 2010 03:32 PM
Pennsylvania Democrat John Murtha died this afternoon at a hospital in Virginia, following complications related to gall bladder surgery he underwent in January. Murtha, 77, had served in the House for 36 years. The first Vietnam veteran elected to Congress and chair of the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, Murtha wielded enormous power over defense related issues and boldly sought earmarks that benefited his district.
For more on Murtha, his life, achievements and brushes with scandal, The Washington Post has a comprehensive obit.
-
Daniel Stone
|
Feb 8, 2010 01:53 PM
Palin 2012 buzz is again in the air, this time after her punchy and
oft-replayed address to the national Tea Party Convention on Saturday.
The fallout from the speech has been predictable. Her base unified
firmly while the left calculates just how big a threat she’ll pose in
November and 2012. Meanwhile, the cable and Web echo chambers have
honed in on the delectable story of some crib notes that Palin conspicuously wrote on her hand to remind herself of prepared talking points.
Embarassing,
perhaps, especially after Palin knicked Obama in the same hour for also
trying to appear candid by reading from a teleprompter. But it’s far
from a fatal gaffe. There was much more included in Palin’s speech and
her general self-promoting strategy to pick apart, and Republican
politicos aren’t happy with any of the above.
More
-
Sarah Kliff
|
Feb 8, 2010 01:36 PM
That is not an article from The Onion; it’s actual, real news.
The Pew Research Center has some new, interesting numbers up on public opinion and health-care reform.
The general takeaway is that, while the same numbers of Americans
support reform, they’re increasingly pessimistic about its odds of
passing. It’s notable that, despite all the roadblocks in the
legislative process, the same number of Americans generally stand
behind it.
What I found most interesting was a section on millennials and health care—partially
because I’m a millennial who covers health care, partially because it
reveals many interesting schisms in my generation’s support for reform.
More
-
Michael Isikoff
|
Feb 8, 2010 12:47 PM
Michael Isikoff reports on the Declassified blog:
White House counterterrorism adviser John Brennan played an unusual
role Sunday when he swiped at congressional Republicans for bashing the
administration's handling of the Christmas Day bombing suspect.
Normally, it is the White House political aides such as David
Axelrod and Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, both seasoned veterans of the
2008 Obama campaign, who take the offensive against the president's GOP
critics on the Sunday talk shows.
But this week, it was Brennan─a professional U.S. intelligence
official who now serves on the president's national-security staff─who
played the attack-dog role. While national-security aides─like Richard
Clarke after 9/11─have been used in the past to rebut political attacks
by providing "background" briefings, and Brennan himself did the Sunday
talk-show circuit immediately after the Christmas Day bombing─it is
extremely rare for a White House aide in his position to so directly
target the president's critics, much less members of Congress by name,
according to several former White House staffers and congressional
staffers.
Read the entire post here.
-
Katie Connolly
|
Feb 8, 2010 11:08 AM
Jon Stewart has said
on a couple of occasions that he can’t tell if Obama is like a Jedi
master, three moves ahead of the rest of us all the time, or if this
health-care thing is kicking his ass. It’s unclear which category
yesterday’s announcement of a televised, bipartisan health-care-reform
summit at the White House falls in to.
On first blush it seems
like a smart move. Rather than letting Republicans snipe on the
sidelines, slowly killing the bill, Obama is bringing them in, squarely
implicating them in the legislation’s fate. Keep your enemies close and
all that. Republicans will get what they’ve been clamoring for─a
transparent set of negotiations, live on TV. They’ll be able to raise
their issues with the bill and be forced to articulate their
alternatives, rather than just offering blanket opposition. But (and
for Republicans this is a big but) they won’t be starting from scratch.
They’ll be working to alter the bills that have already passed the
House and Senate.
More
-
Daniel Stone
|
Feb 6, 2010 11:12 PM
In what was Sarah Palin’s highest-profile speech since her
address to the Republican National Convention in 2008, the former veep
candidate addressed the National Tea Party Convention Saturday evening
in Nashville. From the start, she took aim at President Obama and
Democrats in Congress. Yet she also referred frequently to the problems
with Washington in general, an insinuation that Republicans might also
be to blame for the problems she and tea partiers see with the federal
government. The basis of her speech, as she put it, was simple:
rein in government spending, be more firm on national security, and
keep the government out of businesses and people’s lives. And not one
person in the room didn’t think she was dead right.
Palin
was clearly preaching to the choir, an audience of 1,100 hanging on her
every word. In the style of the State of the Union, the speech included
dozens of applause lines that brought the room to its feet. The crowd
even broke into chants of “Sar-uh, U-S-A!” and later on, “Run, Sarah,
run,” when discussing the prospects of a Sarah Palin presidency (a
subject she skirted strategically). She even did something that Sarah
Palin almost never does: take questions.
More
-
Daniel Stone
|
Feb 6, 2010 02:51 PM
Tea partiers will be the first to tell you that they don’t intend to
start a third party. They’re angry with Washington and with the
behavior of both parties, but the way toward the nation’s salvation is
to hold current leaders more accountable, not sending new ones to fill
the ranks of Congress. “We just don’t have enough time to do that,”
says Joyce Smith, a retiree from Ellijay, Ga.
Since the movement’s first-ever convention started in Nashville on
Thursday, the pursuit for reporters has simply been to figure out the
force of the movement and how formidable its voice will be in November.
Partiers are uniformly against public spending and expansion of
government, but it’s harder to figure out what exactly they’re for.
Campaigning on "throwing the bums out" might help win an election, but
it’s not a governing strategy. And until now, one of the movement’s
biggest snags has been its inability to articulate concrete changes it
would make to Washington and the federal government.
More
-
Katie Connolly
|
Feb 6, 2010 11:51 AM
A tieless Barack Obama ditched his presidential limo in favor of an SUV this morning and made a short trek up 16th Street in snow-covered D.C. (four minutes, according to the pool report) to fire up the Democratic National Committee’s winter meeting.
If one thing has become abundantly clear about Obama throughout both his campaign and his time in the Oval Office, it’s that he is most energized when his back is against the wall. For all the talk about the woes his administration is facing, the president brought his game face today, his feisty demeanor demonstrating he’s in the mood for a fight. And he’s not giving up on health-care reform. “We are moving forward,” he forcefully declared, twice, to a rousing ovation from the audience.
More