<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blog.newsweek.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Does Anybody Care About the Oscars? </title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/thegolddigger/archive/2008/02/13/sags-what-will-win.aspx</link><description>Duh. Yes. But that's the question CNN asks in this online column thingy , now that the strike from the Writer's Guild of America is behind us and the show will go on (and I will go back to blogging about them.) If you ask me, it's not that the Oscars</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Debug Build: 2.18)</generator><item><title>re: Does Anybody Care About the Oscars? </title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/thegolddigger/archive/2008/02/13/sags-what-will-win.aspx#180634</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:59:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:180634</guid><dc:creator>SeattleMoviegoer</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;not sure who this Ramin person is, but his idea about making the Oscars more appealing to &amp;quot;young viewers&amp;quot; is actually a really OLD idea -- and one that always tends to ruin something good. novelty and innovation is a good thing, but pandering to the young and being a reflection of what's current in pop culture is always a recipe for disaster.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: The Gold Digger</category></item></channel></rss>