Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com

HEADLINE HEADLINE HEADLINE

SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Friday, June 05, 2009 3:00 PM

Andrew Sullivan's Brave and Brilliant Abortion Blogging

Kate Dailey

Take some time today to visit Andrew Sullivan's blog over at the Atlantic, where one of the most capital-F fascinating discussions in recent blog history (which is pretty much all of blog history) is taking place.

After the murder of Kansas physician George Tiller, Sullivan—the deeply Catholic, economically-conservative pundit—did a great job of  covering the political and sociological implications of the crime. But he also started posting first-person accounts of late-term abortion experiences, including some women who chose not to terminate and some who were under Tiller's care. (Tiller provided third-term abortions, one of only three doctors in the country to do so.) An excerpt:

The walls of the clinic reception and waiting room are literally covered with letters from patients thanking him. Some were heartbreaking - obviously young and/or poorly educated people thanking Dr. Tiller for being there when they had no other options, explaining their family, church etc. had abandoned them.

Advertisement

I remember my wife, foggy with sedation after the final procedure, being helped from the exam table. He had her sit up and put her arms around his neck, and then he lifted her into a wheelchair. "You give good hugs" she whispered. He paused just for a moment. "You're just fine," he told her.

After that, more families began providing their stories about the tough choices they had to make regarding a terminating a late pregnancy, all of which are, to paraphrase Sullivan's labels on these posts, "so personal," honest, and heartbreaking. (A round-up of the stories are here, though more have since been published)

That alone would constitute some highly-recommended reading. But the conversation hasn't stopped there. It has expanded to include the point of view of former abortion protesters, the arguments for and against abortion limits, and the debate over what role men should play in shaping abortion policies—basically, it's a smart, reasoned, respectful discussion about abortion, something which is sorely needed but exceedingly rare. (Today, as the discussion has expanded into some more general pro-life vs pro-choice arguments, some of the nuance is lost, and one can see signs of the familiar divisions and rhetoric.)

Throughout it all, Sullivan has been as transparent and honest with his readers as they have been with him, and as the posts continue, one can watch his personal beliefs regarding abortion evolve right there on screen. On Monday night, he said, "I still cannot in good conscience support these [late-term] abortions." By Wednesday morning, he was admitting that:

I am beginning to believe that these abortions, given their excruciating moral and personal choices, may be the most defensible in context of all abortions. And yet they seem to be taking life in a more viscerally distressing way. I need time to think and rethink these things. I would not have without reading these extraordinary accounts.

In order to keep another doctor from ever being murdered for his work treating women in need, in order to move towards that elusive "possibility of common ground" that President Obama called for in regards to abortion, we need more thinking and rethinking, more sharing of extraordinary accounts, and more discourse. Sullivan's work on this has been a very, very good start.

RELATED: On NEWSWEEK.com, writer Amanda Robb adds another powerful, personal voice to this discussion. Her uncle, Dr. Bart Slepian, a Buffalo obstratrician, was murdered by an anti-abortion terrorist in 1998, and the death of Dr. Tiller has brought back painful memories. Read her story here.

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: bojack27 (June 9, 2009 at 4:19 PM)

Scout4U,

I doubt that you are a Christian who supports killing a child because of they will probably be abused! That is a oxymoron to say the least.....let's remember Jesus words when we claim to follow Him....

Luke.17

[1] Then said he unto the disciples, It is impossible but that offences will come: but woe unto him, through whom they come!

[2] It were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea, than that he should offend one of these little ones.


Posted By: scout4U (June 8, 2009 at 10:40 PM)

Thank you Jesus! for Mr. Sullivan having the depth of integrity and moral courage to challenge his own preconceptions in public debate.  I am a devout Christian, life long, as well as a mother and a volunteer (as in no funds received) foster parent for children whose parents thought it more important to follow an ignorant blind devotion to their otherwise much ignored religion of origin than to have an abortion when they clearly had no reason to believe that the children could be raised in a safe environment. These people should definitely have had abortions instead of giving birth to them...and no, they would not allow their children to be adopted out, for the simple fact that people who are selfish enough to abuse their children are not going to give them up voluntarily.  I'd like to see the stats on how many anti-choice protesters have EVER adopted or voluntarily fostered any of the 100,000's of abused and neglected children in these U.S., much less, the world at large. No, instead, we will continually read about the  repeated serious parental and societal abuse and neglect that causes our prisons and streets to overfill with the twisted minds born out of  our societies' fear of offending the very God who cries out loud whilst watching the result from a lack of abortion providers combined with the ludicrous social services CPS organizations, who repeatedly dump abused children right back into the arms of the same abusive parents or similarly heinous financially motivated foster "parents".  How do I know this, and why am I so angry about it? Because I am a child of an extremely violent alcoholic father and the sister of an extremely violent alcoholic brother, both of whom, are highly educated and "well off" men.  My brother has been arrested in 3 countries for abusing his children over the last 18 years and in spite of repeat offenses and incarcerations for substance abuse, he ALWAYS finds a way to get the children back and now, my niece has turned into an abuser, too.  My father is a 78 yr.old decorated cold war military officer, who sits on the board of Boys Town of Nebraska! And my brother is a "professional" medical surgical sales rep for a heart pacer company and consulted  with heart surgeons for 20 years.  Both men consider themselves to be Catholic and believing in God! Have priests ever intervened for their children or wives? No...my mother eventually left my father, but only after renouncing her Catholicism to do so.  Both my mother and sister in law were adult children of abusive fathers, so marrying one seemed normal, until to their horror they found themselves faced with the same violence that tormented their childhoods. Not that you struck a nerve or anything! Making abortion available is not equivalent to recommending it willy nilly. But there are many instances where the future of the unborn child would be much better off in heaven than in a hell on earth.


Posted By: brenniewinters (June 5, 2009 at 5:02 PM)

When I heard about this story, I spoke with several women who all said good ridance and that their are no excuses for late term abortions. The men I spoke with were sad this doctors services have ended. What in hades is wrong with this picture?