Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com

HEADLINE HEADLINE HEADLINE

SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Wednesday, July 15, 2009 2:36 PM

Preventing Pregnancy 'One-Step' Easier: FDA Approves Simpler Plan B

Kate Dailey

 

The Food and Drug administration yesterday approved a new advancement in reproductive health. Starting next month, women 17 and over can purchase Plan B One-Step, a one-dose version of the emergency contraception. (Women under 17 can access the medication only with a prescription). With Plan B: Original Flavor, the pills—which contain a high dose of the hormone levonorgestrel—had to be taken 12 hours apart. Not a problem if you're an early riser who makes it to the pharmacy before work, then slips the second pill just before the latest episode of Top Chef: Masters. But for everyone else ...

"It makes intuitive sense that the one dose would be an obvious way to increase compliance," says Jennifer Rogers, acting executive director for Reproductive Health Technologies Project. "Sometimes, with two doses, women would delay taking their first pill. If you buy it at 2 p.m., but don’t want to wake up at 2 a.m., you may wait another six hours to begin the course of treatment," she says. Though emergency contraception can be effective up to 120 hours after unprotected sex, effectiveness does decreases hour by hour, so the sooner it's taken, the better. 

"For us, one pill makes the most sense," says Rogers. "A lot of providers tell their patients to take it off-label [using a medication in a way not approved by the FDA] and just take both pills at one time, and that has helped compliance."

Advertisement

Unfortunately, halving the dose probably won't halve the cost of the drug, which rings up at about $50. Pricing for Plan B One-Step has yet to be finalized, but will likely by similar to the original Plan B, says a rep for the company. However, the patent for the original Plan B expires Aug. 24, which means cheaper generics may soon be available for the two-pill combination. While the FDA also lowered age limit for women to buy the the One-Step OTC (as opposed to with a prescription) to 17 from 18, the fact that it's prescription-only for younger women means Plan B lives behind the counter at the pharmacy, making access and ease of purchase more difficult.

Will making Plan B easier to take make it more likely to be used? Or are the impediments to getting Plan B in the first place still too great an obstacle? Share your thoughts below.
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: greymatter (July 21, 2009 at 10:16 AM)

women already have the right to decide whether to conceive a child, pill or no pill, protected or unprotected. don't have sex. it is a want, not a need. then killing your offspring is yet another 'choice' (either with a doctor or not by just one pill) that sadly our society has embraced as a 'reasonable' or even 'correct' alternative to initial responsibility to just say no, you can't take an aspirin at school without a nurses approval or see a doctor without a parent, but still you can take a over the counter pill, kill a human being? twisted!


Posted By: belladonna203 (July 20, 2009 at 9:24 PM)

I, as a teenage girl myself, am very happy to see that the contraceptive is now being offered to 17+ women nowadays. I seriously do hope that this does mean that more women (specifically teenage girls who are no where near ready to have a baby or worse- start a family) will be using this, because misty baby is right, women deserve the right to decide whether or not to conceive a child. I personally think that regularly taken birth control is the better, more responsible option when it comes to sexually active teenage girls (for instance who is to say that even if a 17 year old girl who ironically ran out of her Plan B pills has unprotected sex and then may result in an unwanted pregnancy) but I definatly am glad that this is now available without a prescription. I just can't wait for the day that sex finally becomes a more open topic and that just because some people don't have sex before marriage- and especially teens- does not mean that there is a problem or that they are a bad or irresponsible person. It is actually a shame to see the rising number of unwanted pregnancies in my generation all because of accidents or because the little protection they used was not enough. But in my personal opinion, 17+ is not a low enough age. Your current average teen girl has lost her virginity by 8th or 9th grade, and is technically "sexually active" by her sophomore year of high school, no doubt. Sure, that may not be every girl, but technically BEING a teenage girl, I think I am qualified to say one sure-fire thing, that absolutely no one (except suburban parents in denial) can disagree with: 17+ is not good enough.


Posted By: misty baby (July 19, 2009 at 7:28 PM)

yes i feel plan b is a grat idea but yes this gives the woman control of yes or no to concieving so it dosent give the man control i believe there should be a plan b for both parties involled the decision should be between the couple if thier ready to start that family together or not the price should be low so its intiesieve to buy and also should be inlocation of pharmacys were no has to ask anyone anything this is a privite mater not  public matter misty