Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com

HEADLINE HEADLINE HEADLINE

SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:58 PM

GOP Senator's Racy Pics Don't Matter - Because He's a Dude

Katie Connolly

Crossposted from The Gaggle

Most of the attention on the Massachusetts Senate race so far has focused on the growing pool of Democratic candidates, which makes sense given that Democrats virtually own the seat. So you'd be forgiven for missing GOP state Sen. Scott Brown's announcement Saturday that he's entering the race. Brown's been a fixture in Massachusetts conservative politics since the early 1990s, and he's served in the Massachusetts Senate since winning a special election in 2004. Some Gaggle readers may remember the fiscal conservative as the father of American Idol contestant Ayla Brown. But others may remember him from his 1982 nude centerfold in Cosmopolitan, dug up by Wonkette back in 2007.

 

Advertisement
Cosmopolitan, 1982                                                                                     

Brown was just 22 when he won Cosmo's "America's Sexiest Man" competition. Cosmo wrote that "adorably sexy" Brown likes "slinky girls" and that he wasn't shy about taking his clothes off. "I'm not ashamed of my body," Brown told Cosmo. "I work hard enough to keep it in shape. When you go to the beach, you automatically seek out the best bodies, female and male. Why should it be different in a magazine?" Upon reading the full spread, girls will discover that Brown, a self-described patriot, is someone they should want to "snuggle over the longer haul." (I'm thinking campaign slogans here─"Brown: A Senator You Can Snuggle.") A law student at Boston College at the time, Brown said he intended to put his $1,000 prize toward his tuition.

Jokes aside, that this racy pic has been circulating for years and hasn't hampered Brown's career perhaps isn't that surprising. "It's a pretty tame photo compared to what you might see at an NFL halftime show," says campaign spokesperson Eric Fehrnstrom. "The fact is, when Scott was 22 years old, he was footloose and carefree."  That may be so, but how would he be treated if he were a woman?

Although a nude centerfold might not kill a female politician's career, it would most certainly prompt questions about her character. Was she unacceptably promiscuous? Did she have a wild, compromising youth? While we scoff at the exploits of young men─they're allowed to be "footloose and carefree"─women are rarely afforded that luxury. For Brown, who just turned 50, it's a case of "boys will be boys." We can giggle at Brown's treasure trail and not think twice about how the sight of it affects his political career. But when Sarah Palin's head was Photoshopped on the body of a gun-totin', bikini-clad babe, it served as evidence for many of her unsuitability for office. Even when the photo was proved to be fake, it continued to haunt her. Palin's sexuality was at once titillating and  threatening─for as many fans as she gained for being attractive, there were as many who used it in building the case against her. If Barbara Boxer had posed nude in her youth and declared her love for "buff boys," I predict her voters would be collectively horrified, and she'd probably never shake the crass jokes that would follow. As a culture, we simply don't like our female representatives to be publicly sexual.

In the end, there are many reasons why this photo won't matter much in this campaign─not least of which being that Brown's chances of winning Kennedy's seat are minuscule. But it probably won't matter much to the rest of his career, either. It's just one of the advantages of being a dude.

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: Bear3 (September 16, 2009 at 10:30 AM)

This is not about youthful silliness or a starving student. This is about an individual who has shown life-long, consistent bad judgment, and a willingness to do anything to get ahead.

In the recent past Scott Brown used his office as state senator to gain access to students at King Philip Regional High School under false pretenses. Brown claimed that he had received complaints from constituents about a teacher who, he alleged, had been speaking in support of gay marriage in his classes. Brown opposes gay marriage.

Brown approached the school and said he wanted to present his views on this subject. The principal refused to provide him with such a forum, so Brown went over the principal's head to the superintendent of schools. The superintendent overruled the principal, probably in deference to a senator. Would you or I have had the same success? I doubt it.

Once Brown gained access to the school and had a group of young students together in an assembly, he went on a tirade about "abusive" emails his daughter had allegedly received from several students at the school. According to adults present, Brown yelled and swore, including using the f-bomb to this captive audience of young people.

In other words, Brown gained access to the school under false pretenses by using his position as a state senator, then used that access to pursue issues that pertained only to his own family—issues that had nothing to do with gay marriage.

Think about it. First, had it been true that a teacher presented a one-sided view of any subject, that was an issue between parents and the school administration, not an issue in which a state senator should be involved. Second, Brown's daughters attended a private school, so he had no parental standing at all to be there, never mind presenting any "opposing view."  Third, Brown’s behavior at the school was completely inappropriate, self-indulgent and insulting, especially to the vast majority of students at the assembly who had no connection to the emails in question.

Yet to this day, Brown doesn't get that. He brushes this very serious incident aside, claiming that the foul words he used were only quotes from the emails his daughter had received from one or more King Philip students. Somehow he thinks that that made the whole thing OK. I saw him do exactly this for myself in a candidates' debate Brown was in at Attleboro City Hall in 2008.

Clearly, a person with Brown's lack or integrity or moral compass has no business holding any office of public trust, never mind that of a U.S. Senator.  The voters should reject him, and I have no doubt that they will.