Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com

HEADLINE HEADLINE HEADLINE

SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Tuesday, November 10, 2009 12:03 PM

Emma Thompson's Polanski Reversal: Even Celebs Get Peer Pressured

Raina Kelley

By now, news has reached the blogosphere that Emma Thompson has asked to remove her name from the online petition in support of Roman Polanski.  (Remember him?  He’s the famous director who was convicted of unlawful sexual contact with a minor.) 

Turns out that one of her fans had the courage to ask her to reconsider her support of Polanski.  Well now, I feel stupid.  I too was heartbroken that Thompson had signed the petition. But I didn't do anything about it.  I just complained to my friends and sulked. Thompson, through the roles she has played, and her good works on an array of worthwhile causes she's devoted herself to, is a role model for us women who don't want to play cute to get ahead. But when she signed the petition, I just felt that she was another insular superstar whose strength and cool was just for show.  I am so glad I was wrong.

But isn’t it amazing that one of the reasons Thompson says she signed in the first place was because she was getting tons and tons of calls from her film friends pressuring to sign?  You see, peer pressure doesn’t go away when you grow up and graduate from high school; it follows you wherever you go. (Sigh.) So, I’m hoping (without hope) that Thompson’s act becomes a cause célèbre and peer pressure will force all the other boldface names that I admire to also get their names removed (um, Wes Anderson, it’s your turn).  Should you be a celebrity who’s dying to take her name off and are too frightened—Emma just gave you cover.  Here, I’ll even spin it for you, free of charge.  Simply say something like this: “Emma’s courageous act has made me realize that I just didn’t know what I was signing.  A crime is a crime and nobody deserves special treatment.” 

Advertisement

Oh and just so you don’t seem like a pushover you can also add something like: “But I also have serious concerns that Polanski didn’t get a fair trial last time around and we have to be careful that we’re punishing him for the right things.”  That way, you can get your famous friends off your back and do the right thing. 

So far Thompson has denied our request for an interview but if we do get her on the line, we’ll thank her.

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: nh99 (November 16, 2009 at 2:17 AM)

I'm glad she at least is owning up to it as a mistake, even if it's a big mistake with a lame excuse. (Peer pressure - what are we in junior high.)  Even the French have started questioning their defence of Polanski.  I'm still quite shaken that Wes Anderson signed the petition and I wish he would remove his name. I try to rationalize his decision - that it was a hasty decision, they were upset that a film festival had been made into a legal trap and put Polanski's previous  suffering above his victim's, but I really don't think I can watch one of his films and enjoy it in the same way any more. In the back of my head it will be bugging me. If you read any of the victim's testimony, it's quite clear that she didn't want to be sodomized by Polanski in any way.  It was a forcible rape by any standard.  No one should be allowed to escape justice for such a despicable crime, no matter who they are or what they've been through.


Posted By: SAC_NANA (November 14, 2009 at 12:41 PM)

I am so glad to hear that Emma Thompson has changed her mind. For the life of me, I could not understand how all these celebrities were jumping on the bandwagon for this pedophile. Mia Farrow led the charge. What was she thinking? After her experience with Woody Allen and their adopted daughter, you would think she knows better. A pedophile is pedophile!!


Posted By: Conster (November 12, 2009 at 3:53 PM)

Mauro Yes and Anti Lolita, where have you been?  Why would you comment on a story you obviously are not informed about?  This was a forcible rape.  While the woman at the center of the case wants to move on, and speaks of forgiveness, she has actually never denied that it was a terrible crime. The girl, now a woman, has NEVER changed her story or recanted her account of what happened, which is that he drugged her and forced her against her repeated objections and pleas.  That is RAPE at any age, and sex with a 13 year old by an adult would also be rape in virtually any circumstance, Anti Lolita's personal story notwithstanding.  (And I doubt you would have loved your instructor so much for so long if he had treated you with the brutal disegard that Polanski showed the victim in this case.)  It doesn't matter how long ago it happened.  He committed a heinous act against a defenseless young girl, he never showed any remorse, and he fled the country rather than fight to clear his name or serve his punishment with dignity.  It's Polanski who forced the U.S. to have him extradited, and the Swiss were quite right to comply.  I like his movies myself, but that doesn't excuse what he did.  Mauro Yes, I make no claim to be a perfect human being, but I am absolutely confident that I'm no rapist.  I don't think it's "ugly" or bad natured to call out this horrible thing for what it is.  Good people should stand together on such a thing and make it clear such actions are not tolerated even by the rich and famous.