Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com

HEADLINE HEADLINE HEADLINE

SPONSORED BY
  • Steve McNair, Sahel Kazemi, and the Sad Truths About Murder-Suicide

    Kate Dailey | Jul 9, 2009 06:11 PM


    by Kate Dailey and Rebecca Shabad

    After four days of speculation, the Nashville police department confirmed on Wednesday what many people had already assumed: Steve McNair was shot and killed by his girlfriend, Sahel Kazemi, who then turned the gun on herself. It was a shocking death, and the fact that a former NFL All-Pro quarterback died at the hands of a 20-year-old waitress seemed more shocking still, defying both preconceived stereotypes about women and violence and criminal profiles of these types of crimes.

    Though the U.S. government doesn’t keep specific stats on murder-suicides, the Violence Policy Center, a Washington, D.C.-based foundation focused on gun control, puts out a report every few years devoted to tracking such crimes. According to the latest one, published in 2008, in the United States 1,000 to 1,500 deaths per year are the result of murder-suicide. The overwhelming majority of these deaths involve firearms, and the violence is often the last act in a long pattern of domestic and emotional abuse. The Violence Policy Center found that 95 percent of murder-suicides were perpetrated by men in 2007, a number that has stayed pretty constant since the center started keeping statistics in 1992. “It’s very unusual for the woman to be a shooter in a murder-suicide,” says Kristen Rand, the center’s director of legislation.

    In fact, it’s unusual for women to commit any violent crime. Homicides by a woman were never large to begin with but have declined by almost 50 percent between 1976 (when there were 3,295 homicides committed by women) and 2005 (1,826 by women), according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. In that same time, the chance of a man being shot by a woman decreased by 75 percent.

    That’s primarily due to an improvement in social services that removed women from violent and dangerous homes, says Jack Levine, professor of criminology at Northeastern University and coauthor of The Will to Kill: Making Sense of Senseless Murder (Allyn and Bacon 2008). “Now they have shelters, restraining orders, and police intervention,” he says. “Those things were not available 20 or 30 years ago. A woman who was abused or battered over a period of time didn’t really see a lot of options, and killing their partner was sometimes the only option they saw,” he said.

    When women do kill today, they’re likely to kill someone they know well, says Levine, and in cases of murder-suicide, they usually kill just one other person—as opposed to “family annihilators,” men who kill their entire family (or office or church group) before turning the gun on themselves.

    Both men and women who commit murder-suicide are often motivated by jealousy, says Louis B. Schlesinger, professor of psychology at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, though often to a pathological or even psychotic degree. These cases are rarely committed in the heat of the moment; there’s a pre-homicidal context that leads to a homicidal break. “I think her world was absolutely falling apart, and she thought he was the reason,” says Carol Oyster, professor of psychology at the University of Wisconsin and coauthor of Gun Women: Firearms and Feminism in Contemporary America (NYU Press, 2000). 

    The fact that Kazemi killed McNair in his sleep fits a pattern typical of women killing men. “Most people are going to try to defend themselves,” when a gun is drawn, says Oyster. “Choosing a time when he really couldn’t fight back was, in her mind, the safest way to do it, because even if she wanted to die herself, she didn’t want him to do it,” she hypothesizes. Many women who do murder their partners do so while the partner sleeps, says Schlesinger, and the “battered wife” defense is based on the idea that a woman who kills a sleeping man can still be acting in self-defense, as that's the only time she can safely fight back.

    There is no evidence that McNair was abusive to Kazemi, of course, and women don’t just commit crime when they’re being abused. “Women commit all the same types of crime men do, just less frequently,” says Schlesinger. In fact, while the number of homicides committed by women has decreased in the past 20 years (as has the number of overall homicides), the number of women involved in other types of crime has increased.

    When talking about Kazemi, however, Oyster suggests that discussing “women” and crime might be a misnomer. “Twenty-year-olds are not cognitive adults,” she says. “The decision making isn’t fully mature until about 24.” 

    At 20, it’s illegal to purchase a weapon from a licensed gun dealer. But Kazemi purchased her gun from a private source, and Tennessee law permits those over 18 to carry a weapon. These types of unlicensed sales—and the lack of a central U.S. registry—makes it difficult to determine how many men own guns compared with women, but anecdotal evidence suggests that the women who do own guns are just as active and interested in firearms as their male counterparts.

    “I teach women pistol handgun skills, and we’ve had to turn women away because we just don’t have enough instructors to deal with the demand,” says Oyster, who notes that women, like men, purchase guns to protect themselves, their homes, and their families—and warns that stereotypes about gender should not blind us to the capacity of female gun owners to perpetrate the same kinds of violence as men.



  • Subconscious vs. Unconscious: Writer Russ Juskalian, Two Psychologists, Freud, and Wikipedia Respond to Your Comments

    Kate Dailey | Jul 9, 2009 02:36 PM

    Writer Russ Juskalian’s story on cryptomnesia had a lot of readers talking—specifically, about our use of unconscious over subconscious when discussing the practice of copying other people's work without realizing it. So we asked Russ to further explain the language he used in the article. His response, below:

    Unconscious, as a few people pointed out, can mean “not conscious”—as in knocked out. But the term also means unaware of, or “done or existing without one realizing.” Those are adjectives. As a noun, “the unconscious” is the part of the brain that the conscious does not have access to.

    In fact, the title of the Marsh study mentioned in the story is “Eliciting Cryptomnesia: Unconscious Plagiarism in a Puzzle Task.” Richard Marsh [a professor of psychology at the University of Georgia] uses the term “unconscious” throughout his paper—but doesn’t use “subconscious” in a single instance. A quick check of the scientific literature turns up many references to cryptomnesia as “unconscious plagiarism.”

    Marsh had this to say, via e-mail:

    [“Subconscious”] has a historical connotation coming from the subliminal priming literature in visual and auditory perception. The other connotation of subconscious is that the information is sort of hanging around in a sort of activated state, waiting to be used. These connotations are completely antithetical to inadvertently borrowing ideas (or pieces thereof) that one was exposed to months or years before. I just got off the phone with the leading expert in memory and he agrees with the foregoing. The term “unconscious” is correct and the term “subconscious” is wrong.

    When I asked Dan Schacter [a professor of psychology at Harvard] about the usage, his response via e-mail was this:

    I have never seen cryptomnesia referred to as “subconscious plagiarism” in any of the literature I've read, whereas “unconscious plagiarism” is a commonly used term. In fact, “subconscious” is virtually never used in modern-day cognitive psychology or cognitive neuroscience to describe any of the phenomena of interest to the article.

    Freud even wrote this (as found on Wikipedia, but checked using Amazon.com and searching for “subconsciousness” in the book The Question of Lay Analysis) [Editor’s note: as befitting of someone writing about plagiarism, Russ takes both accuracy and attribution very seriously. I was considering deleting both the Wiki and Amazon references since the quote seems to hold up, but wanted you all to see the dedication.]:

    If someone talks of subconsciousness, I cannot tell whether he means the term topographically—to indicate something lying in the mind beneath consciousness—or qualitatively—to indicate another consciousness, a subterranean one, as it were. He is probably not clear about any of it. The only trustworthy antithesis is between conscious and unconscious.

    For more reading, it’s worth checking out the following Wikipedia entries—not as the final word, but as a good place to start:

    The unconscious mind might be defined as that part of the mind which gives rise to a collection of mental phenomena that manifest in a person’s mind but which the person is not aware of at the time of their occurrence. These phenomena include unconscious feelings, unconscious or automatic skills, unnoticed perceptions, unconscious thoughts, unconscious habits and automatic reactions, complexes, hidden phobias and concealed desires.

    The term subconscious is used in many different contexts and has no single or precise definition. This greatly limits its significance as a meaning-bearing concept, and in consequence the word tends to be avoided in academic and scientific settings.

  • Advertisement
  • One In Sickness, One In Health: Why Deathbed Marriages Endure

    Newsweek | Jul 9, 2009 01:06 PM

    by Abby Ellin


    During the six years that Kay Haskins and Dan Brigham were in a serious relationship, marriage came up only occasionally. Neither one was ready at the same time, and in 2004 they broke up. But in February 2008, Haskins and Brigham reconnected, and fell right back in love. He then told her the grim news—his prostate cancer, diagnosed in 2001, had returned. This time, marriage became the priority. They got engaged two months later, and planned for a May 2009 wedding.

    By early spring of this year, it was clear that Brigham was not going to last much longer. Still, Haskins, 54, was determined to give her fiancé–and herself—their last wish as a couple: to be married.
    On Thursday, April 16, soon after Brigham, 65, slipped into a coma, an ordained chaplain at the hospice performed a nonbinding ceremony, uniting Brigham and Haskins as man and wife.

    "Deathbed marriages"—unions that occur when one party is terminally ill, if not actually on his or her deathbed—have made some very public appearances as of late. The writer Caroline Knapp, author of Drinking: A Love Story (Dial Press, 1997), married her longtime boyfriend a few weeks before she died of lung cancer in June 2002. British reality-TV star Jade Goody—battling cervical cancer, bald from chemotherapy, and barely able to stand—married her boyfriend of four years, Jack Tweed, on Feb. 22. She died one month later.

    The most famous recent deathbed marriage was not a marriage at all, but an accepted proposal. Farrah Fawcett and Ryan O’Neal were never married before she passed away last month. But, as O’Neal told Barbara Walters in late June, he had repeatedly asked Fawcett to marry him numerous times. Only shortly before her death did she agree—after nearly 30 years and one child together—to be his bride.

    Similar to soldiers tying the knot before shipping off to war, a terminal illness may hasten hazy plans for pairs who see marriage in their distant future. But why do some couples—especially those who had been together for so long, whose lives were so clearly entwined, and who had shown no real desire to “make it official”—want to get married when life is almost over? Is it about making something "right" in the eyes of God or society? Is it because people are, ultimately, more traditional than they realize, especially when death comes knocking?

    Find out, after the jump. 

    More