Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Saturday, July 26, 2008 1:23 PM

How to Plan Financially for a Divorce

Newsweek

 
Illustration:Chris Gash for Newsweek
Committing to Separation: Divorce decrees increasingly include ‘disaster scenarios'

By Linda Stern
Aug. 4, 2008 issue

It’s been more than a year since Janette Chamberlin and her husband decided to divorce. To save money on lawyers, they’ve been negotiating their own settlement and are ready to draw up the papers and finalize the deal. She even has a new boyfriend. The catch? The Chamberlins still live together in their house outside Philadelphia. The couple just sold their home, and, as a result, neither has been able to afford to move out.

Advertisement

The economy is taking a toll on marriages, but it is tough on divorces, too. Couples can’t unload their houses for enough cash to pay off their mortgages and home-equity debts, but job losses and tougher mortgage standards make it harder to afford splitting them, too. “I’m seeing many people who lose jobs and just don’t have the money to pay their alimony and child support,” says Jill Brooke of the online community First Wives World (firstwivesworld.com). Here’s how troubled couples can extricate themselves during troubled times.

• Deal with the house. Couples can hang on to a house until the real-estate market improves, but it’s usually not a good idea, says Stacy Francis, a New York financial planner who deals with divorce issues. “You’re binding two people together financially who don’t want to be bound in any way,” and if one stops paying on the mortgage, it can cause housing and credit problems for the other. It’s better to transfer the house to one spouse, if that spouse can qualify for a mortgage on his or her own.

Couples who can’t afford to do that and find themselves “upside down”—owing more on the home than they can sell it for—are negotiating short sales, in which the bank agrees to cut the loan amount to the sale price the couple gets. Richard Zaretsky, a West Palm Beach, Fla., lawyer, says he is negotiating two or three short sales a week for divorcing couples.

• Plan for disasters and windfalls. Newly divorcing partners are more reluctant than ever to agree to long-term alimony arrangements, because they are afraid their jobs won’t last as long as the divorce deal, says Francis. Many are asking that their divorce decrees include “disaster scenarios”—automatic adjustments to their payment schedules if they lose their jobs. But job loss adjustments should be temporary, and spouses who agree to big alimony deals and then opt for income-slashing career changes shouldn’t be let off the hook so easily, she says.

• Mediate for the long haul. Only one in 10 divorces actually end up in court, with more splitting couples negotiating their own financial arrangements. That’s good, as long as you don’t expect one settlement to handle everything forever. Call in a financial pro to make sure the technical details are covered (find experts at divorceandfinance.org), and expect to return to mediation as your separate lives unfold. “The divorce is not just one moment,” says Brooke. “Life goes on and you’ll always have a relationship with this person.” Even if you eventually stop living together.

Tag(s): ,
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: Johnnybickle (March 5, 2009 at 3:55 PM)

wasawife,

I'm not sure of the details of your situation but you are almost painting your husband out to be a bum. Marriage is a two way street that should be based on love. You resent your husband because YOU were able to get a higher paying job. Guess what, if YOU were a stay at home Mom with no job YOU would be going after your husband's equity, 401k etc, etc. but see in society today women like to paint men out to be deadbeats if they don't make a certain amount, and honestly your remarks here make you sound materialistic. If he changed the locks I'm willing to bet you had an affair. He wouldn't have locked you out for no reason.

Here's an idea, you don't want to split your stuff? Roll up your sleeves and get together and save your marriage. For better or worse, welcome to worse.


Posted By: wasawife (July 29, 2008 at 2:43 PM)

Well, guess what - divorce settlements are more equal.  I'm a female breadwinner who has supported my husband for 10 years.  He ran his own business which never made enough to pay him a real salary, so in the spirit of supporting my spouse, I covered all the bills including the mortgage, which is in my name only.  Finally I had enough due to various reasons, including being sick of supporting someone who refused to accept reality, close the business, and get a paying job, and I left.  According to my attorney, because of the disparity in our incomes, he may actually be entitled to more than half of the equity of a house he never paid into, more than half of my 401k, future payments from my social security, etc.  Not only that, he still lives in our house, has changed the locks so I can't get in, and in the meantime, I have to pay for him to live there as well as rent on my apartment.  Is that fair enough?  Luckily, there are no children involved or I'm sure I'd be paying child support too!  Boy did he luck out marrying me or what?  The bonus kicker is that he's going to inherit 500K when his mom dies - which isn't on the table because it's an inheritance!

I've learned a big lesson here. People, insist on equal partnerships financially.  Otherwise one of you will be ruined in the event of divorce.  I'm 45 and everything I worked so hard for has to be split with someone who never lifted a finger to help out.  Sucks!


Posted By: Genez (July 29, 2008 at 1:35 PM)

In this new era, it is about time that divorce settlements become more equal in regards to financial responsibility.  Divorce laws are terribly skewed to see that the man is left in a state of financial ruin, unless he is a Parul McCarthy or Michael Jordan.  Wjy do I owe her just because she married me?  Divorce law is one of the most bias branches of the judicial department, and still in an age of unparalell feminine advancement seems to be immutable to change.  Visitation rights, alimony, child support payments, you name it, men are treated as if they committed some crime in even consenting to be married.  In the gaining of ground in some other important areas, women have yet to concede ground that came into being during a time when it was deem to be necessary, when women were incapable of providing for their own support, or the support of their children after divorce.  Those times are now extinct.  True, divorce is painful, and in many cases unavoidable, but, the pain should be equally shared seeing that it was equally earned.  Just an opinion.  AJJ.