Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... - Newsweek.com

Wealth of Nations

SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Wednesday, June 03, 2009 1:14 PM

Is Bernanke Nudging Obama on Deficits?

Robert J. Samuelson
Photo credit: Mark Wilson, Getty Images

The most interesting part of Fed chairman Ben Bernanke's testimony this morning before the House Budget Committee was his unambiguous emphasis on the need to reduce future federal budget deficits. Although there was no explicit criticism of the Obama Administration in his prepared testimony, he suggested that deficit reduction needed to go well beyond announced plans. He repeated the projected deficits for fiscal 2009 ($1.8 trillion), 2010 ($1.3 trillion) and 2011 ($900 billion). The ratio of federal debt to GDP (gross domestic product) would go from about 40 percent in 2008 to 70 percent in 2011, the "highest level since the early 1950s." Interestingly, he used the Congressional Budget Office's projections and not the Administration's slightly more optimistic estimates. "With the ratio of debt to GDP already elevated, we will not be able to continue borrowing indefinitely to meet these demands," he said. The implication was that Congress and the White House needed to balance the budget and not merely reduce budget deficits, as the Obama projections indicate. Bernanke has supported large deficits to combat the recession, but he clearly thinks that there are limits.

Bernanke also reiterated the Fed's view that the economy will turn up sometime in the last half of the year. But he elaborated by saying that the forecast was premised on a) the belief that "consumer spending and housing demand will stabilize"--steep declines will no longer be a drag on growth; b) "the pace of inventory liquidation will slow" and also will cease being a major drag; and c) there will be a "continuing gradual repair of the financial system and an associated improvement in credit conditions." Despite a bottoming out of the downturn, Bernanke repeated his earlier assessment that unemployment would continue to rise for some time.

Advertisement
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: Jayney (June 7, 2009 at 4:25 PM)

um why is Bernanke just now worried about the budget deficit? why has no one said hey mr obama why are you spending money, billions of dollars, that do NOT exist?! that has not been earned yet? check the constitution to see who is authorized to spend money. why are you forcing us into unsustainable debt? are you trying to bankrupt this country? doesn't take a law degree to figure out the stupidity & treachery of that! what he is doing is illegal & unconstitutional.

while he is living it up like a drunken king on the hard-working tax payers' dime he is preaching to us about sacrifice. A true leader leads by example not by hypocrisy. the obamas need to take a trip out of their make believe world & into reality. this country is headed for economic disaster. does any "leader" in this country have any common sense????


Posted By: memo2 (June 7, 2009 at 8:22 AM)

Mr:Bernanke have enough time already since he take over Mr:Alan's job, long story about this with Mr:Bernanke and Mr:Bush we all can take as much time we cut the problem is no much time we have to deal with more experiments, the reason I believe Bernanke and Geithner still there is this administration will not be responsible the only can tell you is why they don't want give the chance to Mr:Alan to Lead this economic team? can you explain it what is the problem to add a person with experience ?.....      


Posted By: LMarcT (June 6, 2009 at 6:56 AM)

He will push as he should.  Obama will balance the budget as long as and as soon as NO jobs are affected... currently only allowing the $16B cut for that reason.  More cuts will come, but to issue a stimulus bill and then immediately make drastic cuts makes no sense at all.  The deficit fix comes in second to jobs... without jobs we have no economy and no incoming taxes and no prayer to lower the deficit.

Of course we could have NOT done the stimulus and NOT bailed the banks and AIG and NOT dealt with the toxic assets and NOT helped GM and Chrysler to a smoother bankruptcy and let the economy absolutely tank...THEN balance the budget.  We could have spoken well of the conservative process while standing in the bread lines.