Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com

Wealth of Nations

SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Friday, July 17, 2009 2:00 PM

What's Behind Those Mysterious Billions in Bank Profits

Katie Paul

These last couple of days, my inbox has been filling up with news alerts announcing glistening second-quarter profits at the banks everyone loves to hate: $3.4 billion at Goldman Sachs, $2.7 billion at JP Morgan, $3.2 billion at BofA.

I like a good economic recovery as much as the next guy, but it seems a little too good to be true, doesn't it? Where's this money coming from? How are the banks doing so swell when they haven't come close to clearing out all the trash inventory that sank them in the first place?

Viral Acharya, a finance professor at the New York University Stern School of Business, has some thoughts:

Advertisement

A large number of banks borrowed government debt in October or November of last year. It basically allowed the banks to borrow at a low fee, so effectively the banks became riskless. Once they got the large capital injections, suddenly the issue of them failing in the short term was gone. The bank earnings now seem a lot rosier. I'm happy for the banks, but I'm cautious in saying that this does not necessarily mean that banks are back to being profitable.

There's more on TARP issues and profit-imitating trading strategies in the rest of Nancy Cook's interview with Acharya. It's an important read.

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: mdparvate (July 23, 2009 at 3:32 AM)

If banks are provided with a lot of money as capital,at a nominal cost, their financial position is naturally strengthened and all the loans made by them carry a lot of weight and credit. Ordinary borrowers have no other option but to meet their financial obligation as best as they can.That they have met their obligations attests to their own financial strength to do so.This only means that there was there was short term crisis. But it is still not clear how the banks made profits.It is probably because govt.debt has no urgent obligation to repay and practically the loans govt.grant of money to the banks.


Posted By: cramer_stocks (July 19, 2009 at 7:37 PM)

Criminals! They all tout each other's genius all the while leveraging the public's money. And couldn't we have guessed that Jim Cramer's #1 stock has been Goldman Sachs (GS) for the last 4 years. A chart of his Goldman Sachs (GS) stock picks

http://www.stocktagger.com/2007/09/jim-cramer-calls-goldman-sachs-gs-best.html


Posted By: AlyKhanSatchu (July 19, 2009 at 3:18 AM)

Its called a GOLDEN FLOOD of Free Money. Counterintuitively, if i were Geithner and I knew what was coming Might i not have gone to my Banks and said

'Gentlemen, Buy the World.'

before the devaluation.

Aly-Khan Satchu

www.rich.co.ke

twitter alykhansatchu