Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com

Wealth of Nations

SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Thursday, November 05, 2009 6:13 AM

Karzai's Runoff Concession Damages His Credibility

Newsweek

By Sami Yousafzai and Ron Moreau

Hamid Karzai probably would have won Afghanistan's Aug. 20 presidential election even without the widespread fraud that led a U.N.-backed electoral watchdog to throw out a third of his votes. And he will almost certainly win the runoff scheduled for Nov. 7. But Western efforts to force a fairer vote could leave Karzai deeply, if not fatally, compromised in the eyes of most Afghans. After this summer's contested election, the U.S. and its allies embarked on a relentless arm-twisting campaign to get Karzai to accede to a runoff, which included a visit from Sen. John Kerry and stern phone calls from President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Gordon Brown. The dressing-down eventually worked--but it came at a high price. According to one presidential aide who asked to speak anonymously, Karzai found the tactics so "rude" that he even considered resigning. One of his allies, Parliament member Aryan Yoon, called the international campaign tantamount to "a foreign coup." As a result, although Karzai will probably win the upcoming vote, many experts fear he'll seem far more fragile to ordinary Afghans. "He has been weakened, being visibly bullied by foreigners," admits one of his aides. That could prove debilitating at a time when Afghanistan needs a tough and credible leader more than ever.

Advertisement
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: audiq7 (November 5, 2009 at 9:11 PM)

Have US lawmakers considered what happens to the morale of US troops who now have to "buy"  taliban who killed their colleagues, whom they removed from power several years ago and have to fight constantly for their safety.


Posted By: audiq7 (November 5, 2009 at 9:06 PM)

Musharraf, ousted general/president of Pakistan

Now having said that, when you see the military situation purely…whenever military is asked to apply force to an area, we always have a notion called ‘troop to space ratio.’ And there’s another notion of ‘dilution in space,’ where the space is large and troops are less. Now from a purely military point of view, as a military man myself, I think U.S. forces and coalition forces are diluted in space in Afghanistan. Therefore, I totally agree with General McChrystal when he is demanding more troops.”

Musharraf said drawing a difference between counter-terrorism and counter-insurgency is “not very logical.” He was distinguishing between al Qaeda and the Taliban.

“Certainly they have a nexus. And even if we eliminate al Qaeda, we should not think that by allowing the Taliban a resurgence and governance in Afghanistan, al Qaeda will not come back into the same area. Therefore, we should not treat them separately. They have a nexus, and both have to be dealt with.”

Wherever a terror attack takes place, many people associate themselves with al Qaeda. Now that doesn’t mean that centralized instruction and directives are being given from the mountains of Pakistan by Zawahiri and Osama. So therefore it’s more a symbol now and we shouldn’t think that getting these two will finish al-Qaeda,” he said.


Posted By: audiq7 (November 5, 2009 at 9:04 PM)

Karzai is asking "taliban brothers" to join the Afghan govt. Pakistan continues both funding AND fighting the taliban whose ambitions now include taking over Pakistan ALONG WITH Afghanistan. USA is confused as to which taliban to fight and fund.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/US-to-pay-Taliban-members-to-switch-sides/articleshow/5175572.cms

What in the world is happening??