Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... - Newsweek.com

Wealth of Nations

SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Thursday, November 12, 2009 6:16 AM

Africa Turns Away the Troops

Scott Johnson
Many experts worry that Africa could soon become the world's jihadist base of choice; its combination of failed states, poverty, and pockets of religious extremism offer the perfect breeding ground for terrorists. That's a big reason why in 2007 the Pentagon created AfriCom, a new command responsible for organizing U.S. military involvement on the continent. Why, then, are senior AfriCom officials still stationed in Stuttgart, Germany? The problem is that locals are not exactly enthusiastic. U.S. officials considered both Botswana and Liberia as possible homes for the new command, but strong local opposition forced them to scrap their plans. In general, say AfriCom officials, there is little appetite for a big U.S. base in Africa, since African leaders worry that an American base would inflame fears of a new era of colonialism. According to AfriCom's chief, U.S. Gen. William (Kip) Ward, the hunt for an African host is now "completely off the table." Stuttgart, after all, is in the same time zone as most African countries, and a quick flight from the continent. Still, with counterterrorism operations ramping up in places like the Sahel and the Horn of Africa, a Germany-based command is bound to become messy. A senior AfriCom official who wasn't authorized to speak on the record admits that they haven't quite given up hope: "When the Africans invite us," the official says, "we'll consider it." But that may be a long time coming.
Advertisement
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: Vince Crawley (January 7, 2010 at 11:58 PM)

Clearly, an organization calling itself "AgainstAfricom" has built-in limits on how much it will accept U.S. Africa Command. The consultations with Africans are discussed in the email trail below and reflect the ongoing relationship and partnership the U.S. military has had with African nations since 1983. Of course, our Department of State (the U.S. foreign ministry) has had an Africa Bureau since 1958, and our diplomats continue to be the leadership role with nations around the world, to include Africa. Understand that in the United States, the armed forces are under civilian control and that each service member swears an oath not to a political party or individual but to the Constitution of the United States.

Respectfully,

Vince Crawley

U.S. Africa Command Public Affairs


Posted By: AgainstAfricom (November 28, 2009 at 2:47 PM)

African goverments who welcome the stationing of foreign troops on their soil are simply traitor nations. Africom and the way it was set up smacks of nothing but another Berlin Conference of 1885 where European nations met and carved up an entire continent to their greedy taste. Africans were never consulted when this thing was set up and Africans in the 21st century should not be naive to think anything good of if. This is simply a ploy to take over the command and control of African armies and prop up a number acolytes Mobutus all over the continent. China on the other hand display a master-storke of political genius by inviting African governments to a round-table in Beijin to discuss mutual interests (no emphasis on the military angle). The Cold War is over and nations ought to shelf all militaristic posture to solving foreign affairs. JUST SAY NO TO AFRICOM!!!!!


Posted By: www.twitter.com/roger_pociask (November 17, 2009 at 7:09 PM)

Vince,

Thanks much for your detailed response.  It helps clear the air for those interested in the fine details.  As a US Army veteran married to an African of some political stature, I know at least as well as you (maybe better) some of the hot potatoes your command delicately handles everyday.  I think as time goes on and the command continues to prove itself in word and deed it will become easier.  I recall Gen Ward stating that we can't change the past and he is right.  One really cannot blame average Africans for being wary with the history of colonialism on the continent. And the old cliche, "One Awww Sh*t equals 500 Atta boys!" holds especially true.  I can say this: Africans perceive AFRICOM's motive as benevolent in word but deep down they think there are ulterior motives for the US military to be there beyond peace and security.  I might tend to agree with them, conventional wisdom or not.