Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... - Newsweek.com

Wealth of Nations

SPONSORED BY
  • Chinese Trade Deals Won't Tank The Dollar

    Rana Foroohar | Jun 8, 2009 04:54 PM

    There was more buzz around the reserve currency issue today, thanks to China Construction Bank’s announcement that they may start offering trade financing in renminbi. Already, China does lots of currency swaps with Latin America, Africa and other emerging market nations. On the FT front page today, the CCB news was positioned as yet another undermining of the dollar – China is worried about its stability, and thus wants to push the yuan as more of an international currency.

     

    The truth is that China’s “worries” about the dollar are part real, and part political posturing – China is now at a position on the world stage where it can afford to give advice as well as taking it from rich nations. And while it’s certainly true that China wants the renminbi to become more international, that’s partly to bolster its own weakened export position. By doing currency swaps with countries like Argentina, or South Korea, China makes it easier for them to import more of its goods.

     

    The other thing to keep in mind is that while it’s clear that the position of the dollar will weaken over the coming years, nothing is going to take its place as a reserve currency anytime soon. The US dollar still makes up 64 percent of the world’s reserves (according to the most recent IMF figures from the end of 2008), up from 64.4 percent in 2007. That’s not much of a dip. Even if the world’s central banks began switching into euros (the second place currency) at the rate of 1 percent a year, it would take 30 years for the dollar and the euro to reach parity. Bottom line – using renminbi to cut trade deals isn’t the same as getting rid of the dollar as a reserve.


  • Good News on Interest Rates (Probably)

    Robert J. Samuelson | Jun 8, 2009 01:39 PM
    Is the recent runup of interest rates on long-term Treasuries good news or bad? Well, put the Bank for International Settlements in the good news camp. 

    Since the end of February, interest rates on government bonds worldwide have risen sharply. The rates on 10-year U.S. Treasuries were up about 45 basis points to 3.45 percent by the end of May, while yields on comparable euro area and Japanese bonds rose about 45 basis points and 20 basis points to 3.6 percent and l.5 percent, respectively.

    Broadly speaking, there are two explanations for the runup. 

    The first is good news: investors are now more confident; they think the worst of the financial crisis is over, and so some of the mad dash into Treasury bonds--as a refuge from risk--is reversing . As more money moves into stocks and other bonds, the prices of Treasuries bounds decline, and their interest rates rise. (Bond prices and interest rates move inversely: when bond prices fall, their interest rates rise.) That's good news, because it indicates that financial markets are working more normally. 

    The other theory is bad news: investors are growing increasingly nervous that the huge amounts of money and credit pumped out by central banks, led by the Fed, are laying the groundwork for higher inflation. Therefore, lenders require higher interest rates (a greater "inflation premium") to compensate them for the expected loss of value of their money. That's bad news, because it implies higher interest rates across the board and also suggests that investors aren't becoming much calmer. 

    In its latest Quarterly Review, the Bank for International Settlements--a bank for government central banks, located in Basel, Switzerland--tentatively comes down on the side of good news. There has been, it argues, a "rebound in risk appetite. As the demand for risky assets increases, pressures in government bond markets due to a flight to safety and liquidity began to ease, thereby pushing yields higher." It cites the rebound in stock prices and the decline of interest rates on high-grade corporate bonds as evidence that investors are more adventurous than a few months ago. It notes, too, that surveys show no pronounced increase in "inflationary expectations." 

    However, there is some contrary evidence; the widening gap between inflation-protected bonds and nominal bonds suggests some rise in inflationary fears. Finally, it's worth noting that in June, rates on U.S. Treasuries have continued to climb. On Friday (June 5), they were 3.84 percent.

  • Advertisement
  • Breakfast Buffet, Monday, June 8

    Katie Paul | Jun 8, 2009 12:58 AM

    Not Out of the Woods: So much for the green shoots theory. This weekend was full of forebodingabout the future of the American economy, most pointedly with thisTimes op-ed critiquing Obama's confidence-restoring efforts as"dangerously misguided." (It's a must-read). This comes on the heels ofnews that PPIP, behind schedule and losing steam, might be doomed

    Left in the Dust: The center-right got a big boost in Europe today, winning major victories in the European parliamentary elections. Far-right and anti-immigrant groups also picked up seats. Turnout was at a three-decade low.

    An Economical Mideast Peace Plan: Elsewhere in elections, moderates in Lebanon eked out a victory over Hezbollah in Sunday's parliamentary elections. To shore up support for moderation in the region, says one Al-Jazeera columnist, the West should allow Lebanon to join the WTO. Extremism's economic roots, he argues, should not be underestimated. In related news, the EU agreed last week that Russia should be allowed to join the WTO.

    Investing in the Wild West (and East): Emerging markets were so five minutes ago. Now, investors are looking even farther afield to so-called "frontier" markets like Nigeria and Sri Lanka too unstable to garner "emerging" status.