You discredit any intellectual prowess or persuasive argument when you spout unsubstantiated statistics from disreputable sources. There have not been 'hundreds of thousands' of deaths perpetrated by those who liberated Iraq from the rule by Saddam Hussein.
The vast majority of the deaths in Iraq are the responsibility of Iraqis, vile clerics, Iranian and Syrian and Baathist instigators, and the perversion that is Islamic jihad. Those deaths, by the way, barely reach the 100,000 mark.
The hypocrisy of the liberal left as regards morality is stunningly self-serving and mendacious. An example: The American Left demands that non-Americans taken on the battlefield sans uniform, who would therefore under the Geneva accords justifiably warrant on-the-spot execution, should be given, under 'human rights,' taxpayer-provided lawyers and habeus corpus. (I don't believe our WWII, Korean or Vietnam era solders held as POWs had lawyers, trials, or even three squares?)
However, while we are willing to give so much to comfort people who were engaged in killing our sons and daughters, the Left would deny so many other innocents so much. In America, we, for example, have freedoms of speech, belief, protection, self-defense, press and assembly. Further along, our women, mothers/wives/daughters/friends, have opportunity to vote, to work, to seek an education, to earn, and to be protected in their choice of dress, customs, associations, and ownership/investment.
And we are extending unprecedented legal rights to terrorists? Where is your moral outrage at those who deny their citizens, particularly their women and children, basic human rights? No, it stops at our shores, huh? The fact that our sons and daughters are abroad, seeking to first defeat those planning and carrying out attacks on us, but also to clear and provide for the environment that would foster the opportunities and protections that we have is immoral? We can have, but they cannot? Their opportunities and human rights end when it might cost you? Those whose actions who prompted the arrival of our troops to their lands can have American protections and rights, but those on whom they brought or forced miserable conditions are devoid of protections, and a future of hope?
Where is your evidence that these were wars of imperialist aggression? Where is the free oil, the annexed states, the exploited slave labor, the markets for NASCAR, WWF, Hollywood porn, and the Marriott and Hilton sea-side resorts? Where are the graves of those who died under your 'torture?' On what principle do you rest your moral basis for infusing a POW with greater protections than that of a whole nation?
That is hard, as moral relativists have no principles. Their only principle is "me."